If your a lawyer look away now.

This took place in Charlotte North  Carolina.  A lawyer purchased a box of very rare and expensive cigars, then  insured them against, among other things, fire.

Within  a month, having smoked his entire stockpile of these great cigars, the lawyer filed  a claim against the insurance company.

In his claim, the lawyer stated the cigars were lost ‘in a series of small  fires.’
The  insurance company refused to pay, citing the obvious reason, that the  man had consumed the cigars in the normal  fashion.

The  lawyer sued and  WON!                 (Stay  with  me.)

Delivering  the ruling, the judge agreed with the insurance company that the  claim was frivolous. The judge stated nevertheless, that  the lawyer held a
policy from the company, in which it had  warranted that the cigars were  insurable  and also guaranteed that it would insure them against  fire, without defining what is considered to be unacceptable  ‘fire’ and was obligated to pay the claim.

Rather than endure lengthy and costly appeal process, the insurance company accepted the ruling and paid $15,000 to the lawyer for his loss of the cigars that perished in the ’fires’.

NOW  FOR THE BEST   PART…

After  the lawyer cashed the check, the insurance company  had him arrested on 24 counts of ARSON!!!  With his own insurance claim and testimony from the previous case being used against him, the lawyer was convicted of intentionally burning his insured property and was sentenced to 24 months in jail and a $24,000 fine.
This true story won First Place in last year’s Criminal Lawyers Award contest.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

An Apostle of Free Speech?

I was going to write this piece when all this Wikileaks stuff broke. I decided to wait as I was not sure that my view was settled and I am glad that I did as it has changed considerably.

Initially I was 100% sympathetic to the concept and it remains the case that I am completely supportive of the idea of a site that blows the whistle on wrongdoing but I am increasingly clear that is not what is happening here.

Julian Assange is claimed to describe himself as ‘An Apostle of Free Speech’. Well that is certainly nothing to do with Wikileaks. It should and could be a site for Freedom of Information but, if anything, it is tending presently to discourage Freedom of Speech. It simply cannot be right that anything anyone ever says to a colleague should be posted on a web site if it becomes available. Every one of us has occasion to say things privately, in either a domestic or commercial environment, in the expectation that they will stay private and also, it is clearly everyone’s moral right to be able to have confidences remain confidential. The alternative is anarchy and I rather hope that is a state we are moving away from rather than towards. In the same way it is obviously not proper to publish everything or anything that comes into their hands just because they can.

It is interesting that the leaks that have appeared on this site have all come from the closest we have in our current world to decent democracies. Places with the ability to remove politicians on a regular basis, prosecute corrupt officials and where freedom of information laws exist. It would be much more interesting if the leaks emanated from Russia, China or Iran or other closed societies where freedom of information absolutely is not sanctioned officially or willingly.

Posted in Views | Leave a comment

This works for me! (not enough to buy a BMW)

BMW

Posted in Frivolities | Leave a comment

The most honest car ad for 2010

The Most Honest Car Ad for 2010
BMW
Germany ‘s campaign for their factory approved “pre-owned” cars

Now that’s advertising

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Isn’t Winter Wonderful!!!

I was driving my car back from Edinburgh yesterday when I came up behind a car that had its back window completely obscured with ice and about 14 inches of snow on the roof. I decided that I wanted to get past and as far away as possible as quickly as possible. As I went past it was clear that the driver’s side window was also completely iced over. Lunacy!! Is it not extraordinary how people behave in the snow and ice. Earlier my colleague and I had been driving in Edinburgh and commented on the assumption that appears  to be prevalent that pedestrians walking on ice in the middle of the road in the dark are immune from traffic accidents.

When I was growing up there was an assumption that, in towns and cities, shop keepers, offices or residents kept the bit of pavement outside their house in passable condition whatever the weather and the drains clear if they were host to those as well. Now we all expect the local government to do everything, which would be fine, except that we also constantly bitch about the size of local taxes. This would be a safer, pleasanter and cheaper world if we all took a little more responsibility and pitched in to do our bit. If you have a neighbour you know is, for whatever reason, incapable then do their bit too. You never know you may even feel better for the deed as well as the exercise.

Rankeilour is looking absolutely stunning at the moment. we have had almost a meter of snow, about 32 inches in fact and all the trees are frosted and glint wondrously as the wind causes them to move in and out of the sunlight. Even the wretched Norwegian Spruce, which I normally cannot stand, is looking majestic and noble in these conditions and not at all the spavined apology for a tree that it actually is. There were times when the drive, which is 0.7 mniles long and all uphill when leaving home was becoming a bit of a trial but eventually common sense prevailed and the resourceful Chick  was persuaded to appear with his extremely asthmatic digger and remove most of it.(We are blessed with a choice of Chicks, both fairly piratical, but they conduct their piracy in non competing areas. Thank goodness for both of them.) Being Chick the bucket he had fitted was equipped with teeth so he was not able to get down to the black top but he removed nearly all of it and compacted the rest into an 0.7 mile sheet of ice. If anyone is in need of skid pan training we are able to oblige.

Posted in News | Leave a comment

Real Life

Suppose that once a week, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to £100.If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this..

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay £1.
The sixth would pay £3.
The seventh would pay £7.
The eighth would pay £12.
The ninth would pay £18.
And the tenth man (the richest) would pay £59.
So, that’s what they decided to do.

The ten men drank in the bar every week and seemed quite happy with the arrangement until, one day, the owner caused them a little problem. “Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I’m going to reduce the cost of your weekly beer by £20.00 Drinks for the ten men would now cost just £80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink free but what about the other six men? The paying customers? How could they divide the £20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share? They realized that £20 divided by six is £3.33 but if they subtracted that from everybody’s share then not only would the first four men still be drinking free but the fifth and sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.

So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fairer to reduce each man’s bill by a higher percentage. They decided to follow the principle of the tax system they had been using and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay.

And so, the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (a100% saving).
The sixth man now paid £2 instead of £3 (a 33% saving).
The seventh man now paid £5 instead of £7 (a 28% saving).
The eighth man now paid £9 instead of £12 (a 25% saving).
The ninth man now paid £14 instead of £18 (a 22% saving).
And the tenth man now paid £49 instead of £59 (a 16% saving).
Each of the last six was better off than before with the first four continuing to drink for free.

But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings. “I only got £1 out of the £20 saving,” declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, “but he got £10!”

“Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a £1 too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!”

“That’s true!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get £10 back, when I only got £2? The wealthy get all the breaks!”

“Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison, “we didn’t get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!” The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next week the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had their beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important – they didn’t have enough money between all of them to pay for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and government ministers, is how our tax system works. The people who already pay the highest taxes will naturally get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy and they just might not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible

Thnaks to James.

Posted in Views | Leave a comment

Support the boys in blue.

A bobby from Nottingham Junction,

Whose organ had long ceased to function,

Deceived his good wife

For the rest of her life

With the aid of his constable’s truncheon.

Posted in Frivolities | Leave a comment